Our proud sponsors:

HOME | Notebooks | SLATES | Handhelds | Panels | Embedded | Definitions & Specs | Testing | Industry leaders | Peripherals | About us
Rugged Slates

Perfect for when you don't need a keyboard
(by Conrad H. Blickenstorfer)

Slate computers are full-function Windows machines without a keyboard. The entire computer is built into a slate-like enclosure that is as thin and handy as possible. Since they don't have a physical keyboard, slates use passive or active pens for input. The pen is used both to replace the mouse or joystick for navigation, and sometimes also to actually enter text.

Slate computers may use a passive digitizer that can be operated with a stylus or even a finger. Active digitizers (required by Microsoft's Windows XP Tablet PC Edition) use an electromagnetic digitizer with a special pen. Some pen slates, such as products from Itronix or Xplore, can switch beetween passive and active digitizers. All pen slates have on-screen keyboards or you can, of course, connect a standard keyboard.

Slate computers are perfect for many field applications where low weight and maximum portability are crucial. Some slates weigh barely more than two pounds. Others are heavily sealed and ruggedized and can be used in almost any environment.

A variant of the "pure" slate computer is the notebook "convertible." Convertibles are standard notebooks with displays that twist and then lay down flat on top of the keyboard/system unit, converting the notebook into a slate computer, albeit a relatively heavy one.

Today, Tablet PC slates and convertibles are increasingly successful in many industries, in business, and even with consumers.

A bit of slate computer history

In the late 1980s, early pen computer systems generated a lot of excitement and there was a time when it was thought they might eventually replace conventional computers with keyboards. After all, everyone knows how to use a pen and pens are certainly less intimidating than keyboards.

Pen computers, as envisioned in the 1980s, were built around handwriting recognition. In the early 1980s, handwriting recognition was seen as an important future technology. Nobel prize winner Dr. Charles Elbaum started Nestor and developed the NestorWriter handwriting recognizer. Communication Intelligence Corporation created the Handwriter recognition system, and there were many others.

The pen computing hype of 1991/92

In 1991, the pen computing hype was at a peak. The pen was seen as a challenge to the mouse, and pen computers as a replacement for desktops. Microsoft, seeing slates as a potentially serious competition to Windows computers, announced Pen Extensions for Windows 3.1 and called them Windows for Pen Computing. Microsoft made some bold predictions about the advantages and success of pen systems that would take another ten years to even begin to materialize. In 1992, products arrived. GO Corporation released PenPoint. Lexicus released the Longhand handwriting recognition system. Microsoft released Windows for Pen Computing. Between 1992 and 1994, a number of companies introduced hardware to run Windows for Pen Computing or PenPoint. Among them were EO, NCR, Samsung (the picture to the right is a 1992 Samsung PenMaster), Dauphin, Fujitsu, TelePad, Compaq, Toshiba, and IBM. Few people remember that the original IBM ThinkPad was, as the name implies, slate computers.

The crash of 1993

The computer press was first enthusiastic, then very critical when pen computers did not sell. They measured pen computers against desktop PCs with Windows software and most of them found pen tablets difficult to use. They also criticized handwriting recognition and said it did not work. After that, pen computer companies failed. Momenta closed in 1992. They had used up US$40 million in venture capital. Samsung and NCR did not introduce new products. Pen pioneer GRiD was bought by AST for its manufacturing capacity. AST stopped all pen projects. Dauphin, which was started by a Korean businessman named Alan Yong, went bankrupt, owing IBM over $40 million. GO was taken over by AT&T, and AT&T closed the company in August 1994 (after the memorable "fax on the beach" TV commercials). GO had lost almost US$70 million in venture capital. Compaq, IBM, NEC, and Toshiba all stopped making consumer market pen products in 1994 and 1995.

By 1995, pen computing was dead in the consumer market. Microsoft made a half-hearted attempt at including "Pen Services" in Windows 95, but slate computers had gone away, at least in consumer markets. It lived on in vertical and industrial markets. Companies such as Fujitsu Personal Systems, Husky, Telxon, Microslate, Intermec, Symbol Technologies, Xplore, and WalkAbout made and sold many pen tablets and pen slates.

2002: Microsoft reinvents the pen computer

That was, however, not the end of pen computing. Bill Gates had always been a believer in the technology, and you can see slate computers in many of Microsoft's various "computing in the future" presentations over the years. Once Microsoft reintroduced pen computers as the "Tablet PC" in 2002, slates and notebook convertibles made a comeback, and new companies such as Motion Computing joined the core of vertical and industrial market slate computers specialists.

The primary reason why the Microsoft-specification Tablet PC is reasonably successful whereas earlier attempts were not has two reasons. First, the technology required for a pen slate simply wasn't there in the early 1990s. And second, the pen visionaries' idea of replacing keyboard input with handwriting (and voice) recognition turned out to be far more difficult than anticipated. There were actually some very good recognizers that are still being used today, but they all require training and a good degree of adaptation by the user. You can't just scribble on the screen and the computer magically understands everything. With the Tablet PC, Microsoft downplayed handwriting recognition in favor of "digital ink" as a new data type. This was a very wise decision.

2006 brings the "Ultra-Mobile PC"

During 2005 and even earlier, Microsoft had been hinting at tablets smaller and simpler than even the smallest Tablet PC slates. Such tablets were supposed to cost little, 500-700 dollars perhaps, and represent a "back to basics" move -- computing for everyone, everywhere.

In early 2006, a cleverly managed rumor campaign, led by a Flash site hinting at a mysterious little device called "Origami," was culminated by the release of the "Ultra-Mobile PC," or UMPC, at the CeBIT show in Hanover, Germany. The UMPC turned out to be a small tablet with a 7-inch screen, running the full XP Tablet PC Edition, but using a passive digitizer. To make that work, a set of special touch utilities are included. Not much hardware was shown, and none was initially available. See our intro to Origami and our much more detailed analysis of the Microsoft UMPC platform.

2007: Vista, UMPCs, and MIDs

When Microsoft Windows Vista arrived in early 2007, Microsoft decided to include all pen functionality rather than offering a separate version as it had done with the Windows XP Tablet PC Edition. We've reviewed several slates with Vista and Microsoft did a good job seamlessly integrating all the pen options.

In the meantime, Microsoft had also introduced the Ultra-Mobile PC, or UMPC, platform in March of 2006. Microsoft's described the UMPC as "a device-like computer that is small, mobile, and runs the full Windows operating system. The UMPC goes anywhere and does anything that your current computer can do." The UMPC was initially conceived as a small, inexpensive slate with a touchscreen, but the concept didn't catch on due to low performance and higher than expected pricing.

In May of 2007, Microsoft loosened the design description to "any portable computer running full Windows with a screen size of 7 inches or smaller." Intel announced its own Intel Ultra Mobile Platform 2007 based on low-power Intel A100 and A110 processor designed to drive both UMPCs and yet another category, Mobile Internet Devices or MIDs. MIDs do not necessarily have to run standard Windows. Both the UMPC and the MID platforms are naturals for handheld rugged devices and we'll undoubtedly see many interesting designs.

2008: The return of touch

With the hugely successful iPhone, Apple once again changed everything. The iPhone's sleek and intuitive capacitive multi-touch interface redefined touch screens and what they can do, and all of a sudden everyone else is trying to follow suit. We're seeing touch screens in regular consumer notebooks again, and even in desktop machines. In rugged machines we're more and more seeing "dual touch" systems that can use both touch and an electromagnetic pen. The Tablet PC never really caught on, in part due to technological issues and in part due to Microsoft's inconsistent attention to the platform.

2009/2010: Tablet hype

Multi-touch continues to gather momentum, with many manufacturers offering some sort of multi-touch capabilities in notebooks, tablets and even desktops. The newly released Windows 7 has integrated touch and multi-touch capabilities. Implementation is often clumsy, which shows the difficulty of scaling up the super-smooth operation of the Apple iPhone. Rumors abound of a new Apple slate device all year, and come to a fever pitch at the 2009 CES in Las Vegas where numerous tablets and tablet concepts are shown. Microsoft had been expected to make some sort of tablet announcement, but, apart from CEO Steve Ballmer briefly showing an HP concept, nothing happens.

A few days later, however, Apple announced the iPad, a sleek 1.5-pound slate intended to fit between an iPhone and a regular notebook computer. The device is clearly built from the iPhone up, and not from a notebook down, and so will primarily address the needs of those who have begun using their smartphones as notebook replacements but would like a larger screen. Microsoft, in the meantime, closes its Tablet PC blog and, for all practical purposes, their Tablet PC experiment is over.

2010, in the meantime, became the year of the Apple iPad. Three million were sold in the first 80 day of availability, and the platform sold at about two million units a month for most of 2010. Hewlett Packard bought Palm, and with it Palm's WebOS, a well-regarded OS suitable for potential competitors to the iPad. RIM announced tablet plans, Microsoft made noises about a new tablet platform, and the Google-pioneered and Linux-based Android smartphone OS was widely seen as the most likely platform to compete with Apple.

2011: Begin of the post-PC era?

With some 15 million Apple iPads sold in 2010, it is clear that the touch tablet platform has massive potential. Analysts predict huge media tablet sales, in part replacing netbooks, in part even standard notebooks. Despite the success of the Android OS in smartphones (where it became the leader in 2010), tablet competition to the iPad is slow in ramping up. Samsung launched their 7-inch Tab late 2010, RIM and HP announced tablets, but Motorola got the best press with their 10.1-inch Xoom Android tablet. The biggest problem seems that there is not much opportunity for vendors to a) differentiate themselves, and b) meet Apple's very low pricing.

By early 2011, Microsoft had still not reacted to the tablet boom, still referring to Windows 7. Motion Computing released the CL900, the first somewhat ruggedized media tablet, and Fujitsu followed with the similar Stylistic Q550. Panasonic pre-announced a 10.1-inch Android tablet. In September, Microsoft showed a developer demo of Windows 8 with a touch-oriented "Metro" front end and support for ARM processors, albeit not in "classic" Windows 7 mode. In October, Motorola Solutions, now separate from the Motorola "Mobility" phone business (acquired by Google in the summer of 2011), introduced a ruggedized 7-inch Android tablet, the ET1. And in November, Panasonic announced the Android-based Toughpad line of tablets.

Tablet PC/pen slate reviews
  • Aaeon RTC-1000A
  • Advantech MARS-3100S
  • Advantech MARS-3100R
  • Advantech MICA-101
  • Advantech PWS-8101M
  • Advantech TREK-510/303L
  • Advantech TREK-550/303H
  • Amrel DB6-M
  • AMREL ROCKY DR8-M/DR8-I
  • AMREL ROCKY DK8-M/DK8-I
  • Arbor Gladius G0710
  • Arbor Gladius G0720
  • Arbor Gladius G0820
  • Arbor Gladius G1050
  • Arbor M1040 MCA
  • Arbor M1255 MCA
  • Black Diamond SwitchBack
  • BDA MTS
  • DAP M8640
  • DAP M8800
  • DAP M8910
  • DAP M8920
  • DAP M8930
  • DAP M8940
  • DAP M9010
  • DLI 8300
  • DLI 8400
  • DLI 8500
  • DLI 8800
  • DLI 9200
  • Dell Latitude XT2
  • Dell Latitude XT2 XFR
  • DLoG MPC 5
  • DLoG MPC 6
  • DLoG X 7
  • DRS ARMOR X7 capsule
  • DRS ARMOR X7 full
  • DRS ARMOR X10
  • DRS ARMOR X10gx (2010)
  • DRS Hammerhead
  • DRS Hammerhead Xtreme *
  • DRS MRT
  • DRS Scorpion RVT
  • DRS Scorpion HTU-EK
  • DRS V3 UCC
  • DT Research WebDT 312
  • DT Research WebDT 362
  • DT Research WebDT 372
  • DT Research WebDT 390
  • Elbit Systems ETC Mark IV
  • Elbit Systems Tacter-31D
  • Elbit Systems Tacter-31M
  • Electrovaya SC-4000
  • Fujitsu Stylistic ST6012
  • Fujitsu Stylistic Q550
  • Fujitsu Lifebook T580
  • Fujitsu LifeBook T5010
  • GammaTech Durabook MT10
  • GammaTech Durabook R13S
  • GETAC E100
  • Getac V100 *
  • Getac V200 (capsule)
  • Getac V200 (full)
  • Glacier Computer Magnum
  • Glacier Computer Everest
  • Glacier Computer Ridgeline
  • GD-Itronix Duo-Touch II *
  • GD-Itronix GD3015
  • GD-Itronix GD3080
  • Handheld-US Algiz 7
  • Handheld-US Algiz 8
  • Handheld-US Algiz 10
  • HP Elitebook 2730p
  • HP Elitebook 2740p
  • Juniper Mesa
  • Juniper Mesa (full)
  • Lenovo ThinkPad X200t
  • Lenovo ThinkPad X220t
  • Logic Instrument FieldBook
  • LXE Marathon
  • MobileDemand C1200
  • MobileDemand T7000 *
  • MobileDemand T8700 *
  • MobileDemand xMount
  • Motion Computing C5 *
  • Motion Computing CL900
  • Motion Computing CL900 *
  • Motion Computing F5v *
  • Motion Computing J3500
  • Motorola Solutions ET1
  • NEXCOM 2100 Series
  • NEXCOM MRC 2300
  • LG C1 Express Dual
  • Panasonic Toughbook 19K
  • Panasonic C1
  • Panasonic Toughbook H1 (short)
  • Panasonic Toughbook H1 Health
  • Panasonic Toughbook H1 Field
  • Panasonic Toughbook H2
  • Panasonic Toughbook U1
  • Panasonic Toughbook U1 Ultra
  • Panasonic Toughpad A1
  • RMT Duros 8404
  • RMT Duros 1214
  • Samwell RUGGEDBOOK SR800
  • Samwell RUGGEDBOOK SR820
  • Secure RPS Lynx
  • Secure RPS Orion
  • TabletKiosk Sahara i412
  • TabletKiosk Sahara i440
  • TabletKiosk Sahara i310XT
  • TabletKiosk eo UMPC v7110
  • TabletKiosk eo v7112XT
  • TabletKiosk eo UMPC v7209
  • Talla-Tech Tacter-31M
  • Toshiba Portege M750
  • Toshiba Portege M780
  • Toshiba Portege R400 *
  • Trimble Tablet
  • Trimble Yuma
  • Twinhead DigiHeal T10Y
  • Winmate G570Z (5.7")
  • Winmate 7" Rugged Tablet PC
  • Winmate 9.7" Compact Tablet PC
  • Winmate 10.4" Patient Service Tablet PC
  • Winmate Tablet PC I880
  • Winmate Tablet PC I980
  • Winmate Tablet PC IA80
  • VT Miltope RTSC-2
  • Xplore iX104C4 *
  • Xplore iX104C4M
  • Xplore iX104C5 *

  • Intel Medical Clinical Assistant (MCA) reviews
  • Advantech MICA-101
  • Arbor M1255
  • Arbor M1040 MCA
  • Fujitsu Esprimo MA
  • GammaTech Durabook RT10
  • Motion Computing C5 *
  • Panasonic Toughbook H1
  • RUGGEDBOOK MCA9
  • TabletKiosk i1040XT
  • Winmate 10.4" Patient Service Tablet PC

  • Reviews of replaced and/or discontinued tablets
  • Acer TravelMate C110
  • Acer TravelMate C200
  • Acer TravelMate C300
  • Acer TravelMate C310
  • AMREL HBS-2
  • AMREL ROCKY Apex
  • AMREL ROCKY Patriot DR7-M
  • Averatec C3500 *
  • CATCHER CCAP
  • DRS Hammerhead MRT (8th gen)
  • DRS Hammerhead RT933/XRT *
  • Dell Latitude XT
  • DT Research WebDT 310
  • DT Research WebDT 360
  • Electrovaya SC-800
  • Electrovaya SC2000 *
  • Electrovaya SC-2200
  • Electrovaya SC-3100 *
  • Fujitsu Esprimo MA
  • Fujitsu LifeBook U810
  • Fujitsu LifeBook U820
  • Fujitsu LifeBook P1610
  • Fujitsu LifeBook P1620
  • Fujitsu LifeBook P1630
  • Fujitsu LifeBook T1010
  • Fujitsu LifeBook T2010
  • Fujitsu LifeBook T2020
  • Fujitsu LifeBook T4000
  • Fujitsu LifeBook T4220
  • Fujitsu LifeBook T4410
  • Fujitsu Stylistic ST5000
  • Fujitsu Stylistic ST5000 *
  • Fujitsu Stylistic ST5100
  • Gateway C-141
  • Gateway C-143
  • Gateway M275X
  • Gateway CX200
  • GETAC CA27
  • Getac V100 (original)
  • HP Compaq Tablet PC tc4200
  • HP Compaq Tablet PC tc4200 *
  • Itronix Duo-Touch *
  • Hitachi VisionPlate
  • HP Compaq Tablet PC tc1000
  • HP Rugged Tablet PC tr3000
  • Kontron ReVolution


  • Lenovo ThinkPad X61
  • LG Xnote LT20
  • MobileDemand T8400 *
  • MobileDemand T8600 *
  • MobileDemand T8600 update *
  • Motion Computing F5 *
  • Motion Computing F5 (2009)*
  • Motion Computing J3400
  • Motion Computing LE1600 *
  • Motion Computing LE1700
  • Motion Computing LE1700 2008
  • Motion Computing LS800 *
  • Motion Computing M1400 *
  • Panasonic Toughbook 18
  • Panasonic Toughbook 19
  • Samwell RUGGEDBOOK SR659
  • TabletKiosk Sahara i213
  • Toshiba Portege M200
  • Toshiba Portege M205 *
  • Toshiba Portege M400 *
  • Toshiba Tecra M4 *
  • Toshiba Tecra M7 *
  • Toshiba Satellite R10/R15
  • ViewSonic Tablet PC V1100
  • ViewSonic Tablet PC V1100 *
  • ViewSonic Tablet PC V1250
  • Winmate Tablet PC V280
  • Xplore iX104 *
  • Xplore iX104C2 *
  • Xplore iX104C3
  • Other tablet information
  • 2011 Media Tablets
  • The UMPC Platform
  • UMPC Update
  • Tablet PC Q&A
  • How to select a 2nd gen TPC
  • Microsoft Tablet PC History
  • Tablet PC Q&A (2002)
  • Slate taxonomy (2002
  • Tablet PC Magazine (2002
  • The Microsoft Tablet PC (2001)
  • Pen Computing History (2001)
  • Search
    Google
    Web RuggedPC Review